ruchigup
05-01 01:40 PM
I am taking services of an attorney to write a response. But kind of getting concerned.
wallpaper images Big Sean - quot;What
julsun
07-31 01:58 PM
Hi,
We had been to Canada in Sep, 2003 for our Canadian residency stamping. While on our way back to San Francisco, US immigration did not stamp our passports or take back our I-94's. Prior to this trip we had been to India in March, 2003.
Now I am confused as to what should be our last date/port of entry to US? I-94's/passport stamp still indicates our March, 2003 trip and Our Canadian PR stamp does indicate date PR was stamped in Canada. But there's not other stamp/proof on passport for our entry to San Francisco.
Any pointers/suggestions?
Thanks
We had been to Canada in Sep, 2003 for our Canadian residency stamping. While on our way back to San Francisco, US immigration did not stamp our passports or take back our I-94's. Prior to this trip we had been to India in March, 2003.
Now I am confused as to what should be our last date/port of entry to US? I-94's/passport stamp still indicates our March, 2003 trip and Our Canadian PR stamp does indicate date PR was stamped in Canada. But there's not other stamp/proof on passport for our entry to San Francisco.
Any pointers/suggestions?
Thanks
gc_chahiye
06-14 09:47 AM
---I'm only talking in regards to FY-2007 in light of current development.---
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
they have hinted retrogression in Sept for China, India, etc
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
correct. Which means, come September EB3-ROW is also going to get retrogressed. probably to where it is now.
Now that everything is current there would not be any need to per country quota. CORRECT?
Or since EB3 other is not current ("U") they cannot use AC21?
they have hinted retrogression in Sept for China, India, etc
Now if there is no per country quota, how can they retrogress EB for China, India, or any other country unless EB3 ROW is not current?
So unless they retrogress ROW, logically they should not retrogress at least EB2 for India, China and other countries
correct. Which means, come September EB3-ROW is also going to get retrogressed. probably to where it is now.
2011 Big Sean - quot;I Do Itquot; (Official
![big sean i do it shirt. [Video] Big Sean x Pound](http://thewellversed.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/big-sean.jpg "[Video] Big Sean x Pound")
stebbinsd
01-18 07:50 PM
Oh come on! One hundred and nineteen views and not one reply! What's the matter? Cat got your tongue?
more...
Blog Feeds
02-08 06:10 PM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/flag_CNMI.gifAll immigration law attorneys must deal with foreign countries, unique international legal issues, and some quaint interpretations of law. The lawyers at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun are no exception, and in fact, this recent change affects some of our clients who do business in or own businesses in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
On 28 November 2008, "the United States" as defined for purposes of the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA) just got bigger, with the addition of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Although there are probably wrinkles I have not yet read in the treaty, this essentially puts the CNMI on the same footing as Puerto Rico. Here's the cute part:
Because the CNMI will become part of the "United States" as defined by �101(a)(38) of the INA, "residence or presence in the CNMI before 28 November 2009 shall NOT be considered residence or physical presence within the USA for INA purposes. Thus, on 29 November 2009, all persons physically present in the CNMI are considered "to be present in the United States without inspection, by operation of law."
Will these PWIs (present without inspection) be eligible to adjust status? Unclear? Are they working "abroad" for purposes of L visas? Yes, as it turns out. One thing is clear: Legal Permanent Residents (so-called "green" card holders) who wish to base a naturalization application based on physical presence in the CNMI will NOT be able to do so for pre-29 November 2009 periods of time. Isn't this esoterica fun? --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/02/the-usa-is-bigger.html)
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/flag_CNMI.gifAll immigration law attorneys must deal with foreign countries, unique international legal issues, and some quaint interpretations of law. The lawyers at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun are no exception, and in fact, this recent change affects some of our clients who do business in or own businesses in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
On 28 November 2008, "the United States" as defined for purposes of the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA) just got bigger, with the addition of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Although there are probably wrinkles I have not yet read in the treaty, this essentially puts the CNMI on the same footing as Puerto Rico. Here's the cute part:
Because the CNMI will become part of the "United States" as defined by �101(a)(38) of the INA, "residence or presence in the CNMI before 28 November 2009 shall NOT be considered residence or physical presence within the USA for INA purposes. Thus, on 29 November 2009, all persons physically present in the CNMI are considered "to be present in the United States without inspection, by operation of law."
Will these PWIs (present without inspection) be eligible to adjust status? Unclear? Are they working "abroad" for purposes of L visas? Yes, as it turns out. One thing is clear: Legal Permanent Residents (so-called "green" card holders) who wish to base a naturalization application based on physical presence in the CNMI will NOT be able to do so for pre-29 November 2009 periods of time. Isn't this esoterica fun? --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/02/the-usa-is-bigger.html)
sembat
08-17 04:15 PM
Greetings,
I have a pending 485 application under EB3 category through my wife's application. However, recently her employer applied for the EB3-EB2 change since she already qualifies for EB2. I understand that the priority date remains the same. In our case the priority date is Feb 05. I wanted to know what will be the process going forward. Currently the EB3-EB2 application is on the PERM labor state. Once that gets approved does it mean that our I485 will be adjudicated immediately since for EB2 the priority date has already gone past ours (feb 05)? Or we will need to then apply for another I-140?
If anyone knows the process of EB3 to EB2 transfer can he/she kindly post it?
Thanks
k
I have a pending 485 application under EB3 category through my wife's application. However, recently her employer applied for the EB3-EB2 change since she already qualifies for EB2. I understand that the priority date remains the same. In our case the priority date is Feb 05. I wanted to know what will be the process going forward. Currently the EB3-EB2 application is on the PERM labor state. Once that gets approved does it mean that our I485 will be adjudicated immediately since for EB2 the priority date has already gone past ours (feb 05)? Or we will need to then apply for another I-140?
If anyone knows the process of EB3 to EB2 transfer can he/she kindly post it?
Thanks
k
more...
ThinkTwice
07-09 08:13 PM
I heard from some source that non citizens cannot donate blood... if this is not true then count me in ....
2010 Vintage SnapBack TISA Big Sean
malet
06-02 10:33 AM
Hello, I'm new to this forum. Please don't be tough on me.
I received the folowing letter from NVC. The case is for my dad. He originally filed under F4, priority date 13Jul2000.
What does it mean and what we should do?
Many thanks.
===========================================
Dear Sir/Madam:
Your inquiry has been received at the National Visa Center (NVC).
A letter was previously mailed to the Agent of Choice or Attorney of
Record requesting the amendment of previously submitted applicant forms
and/or required applicant documents that have not been submitted. The
documents listed on the letter and/or the amended forms must be
submitted to the assigned US Embassy or Consulate General at the time of
interview.
The applicant's name has been placed on the list of documentarily
qualified cases awaiting the availability of visa numbers under the
numerical limitations prescribed by statute. The designated
representative of this case (applicant, petitioner, or attorney) will be
notified of an appointment date as soon as the numbers have been
received. The applicant should NOT make any travel arrangements, sell
property, or give up employment until the US Embassy or Consulate
General has issued a visa.
An immigrant visa is usually valid for six months from the date it is
issued. It may be used to apply for admission into the United States any
time during its validity.
I received the folowing letter from NVC. The case is for my dad. He originally filed under F4, priority date 13Jul2000.
What does it mean and what we should do?
Many thanks.
===========================================
Dear Sir/Madam:
Your inquiry has been received at the National Visa Center (NVC).
A letter was previously mailed to the Agent of Choice or Attorney of
Record requesting the amendment of previously submitted applicant forms
and/or required applicant documents that have not been submitted. The
documents listed on the letter and/or the amended forms must be
submitted to the assigned US Embassy or Consulate General at the time of
interview.
The applicant's name has been placed on the list of documentarily
qualified cases awaiting the availability of visa numbers under the
numerical limitations prescribed by statute. The designated
representative of this case (applicant, petitioner, or attorney) will be
notified of an appointment date as soon as the numbers have been
received. The applicant should NOT make any travel arrangements, sell
property, or give up employment until the US Embassy or Consulate
General has issued a visa.
An immigrant visa is usually valid for six months from the date it is
issued. It may be used to apply for admission into the United States any
time during its validity.
more...
liorsal
01-03 12:09 PM
does anyone know if IV core will push to get the 485 relief (ability to file without visa number availeble) and what is the chance to get it befor of until the 15/february?.
hair [Video] Big Sean x Pound
prince40
03-15 10:20 PM
concurrent filing means filing of I-140 and I-485 together not two I-140s.
why do you want to put false data on your profile? such as EB1 at Perm stage with 2000 priority date?
Are you trying to mock all the IV members? Or just being silly?
by concurrent i meant can you file two i-140s under the same EB2 category [regular and NIW] at the same time??
P.S.-regarding my profile that's the default setting w.r.t priority date etc when i set up my account., trying to edit this
why do you want to put false data on your profile? such as EB1 at Perm stage with 2000 priority date?
Are you trying to mock all the IV members? Or just being silly?
by concurrent i meant can you file two i-140s under the same EB2 category [regular and NIW] at the same time??
P.S.-regarding my profile that's the default setting w.r.t priority date etc when i set up my account., trying to edit this
more...
monkeyman
10-19 09:21 AM
I am in a weird situation. My wife has green card and my child is a US Citizen and she has a PIO Card (Indian Green Card). I was on H-4 till my wife got the green card - however, I have been told that the H-4 is invalid as soon as the primary applicant receives the green card. I have received my EAD Card and I have completed the FP. For whatever reason, the lawyer did not apply for I-131 till Oct 12, 2007. Now he says, it will take 90 days. What documents should I be carrying while traveling to India to travel on AP (if I ever get one). Any response will be highly appreciated. Please help.
hot Big Sean Interview with Dj
Machuse
07-11 04:59 PM
I'm interested.....how much??
more...
house Do It ig sean 2011 pics.
tcsonly
07-24 11:43 AM
Can you please point me to the thread? Thank you.
Take some time to search the forums before starting new threads.
The answer to your question is under Greencard retrogression. It's the first sticky thread with title: " All Priority date transfers and issues discussed here".
Admins: Please close this thread.
-C.
Take some time to search the forums before starting new threads.
The answer to your question is under Greencard retrogression. It's the first sticky thread with title: " All Priority date transfers and issues discussed here".
Admins: Please close this thread.
-C.
tattoo Aaron Reid middot; Big Sean
paskal
11-28 05:18 PM
i'm presuming you are not talking about a physician NIW but and exceptional ability category?
more...
pictures hot ig sean 2011 pics. ig sean 2011 pics. 2011 New+ig+sean+2011 ig sean
lghtslpr
03-13 05:00 PM
In the March issue of BioScience (a widely read scientific journal) Gillean Andres reports on the growing momentum for new federal incentives to attract new students into careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The article is available here: Washington Watch: The Cost of Doing Business: Should the United States Create Incentives for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Labor? (http://www.aibs.org/washington-watch/washington_watch_2006_03.html).
Legislators in both parties have been attentive to these proposals. High-profile Republicans, including Representative Frank Wolf (VA) and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, were among the first advocates for a renewed investment in innovation to protect the STEM workforce. Now they have been joined by leading House Democrats and a bipartisan group of senators.
So, the general political climate seems favorable to what Immigration Voice is trying to achieve. The question is whether IV can cash in on the opportunity.
Legislators in both parties have been attentive to these proposals. High-profile Republicans, including Representative Frank Wolf (VA) and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, were among the first advocates for a renewed investment in innovation to protect the STEM workforce. Now they have been joined by leading House Democrats and a bipartisan group of senators.
So, the general political climate seems favorable to what Immigration Voice is trying to achieve. The question is whether IV can cash in on the opportunity.
dresses images listened to Big Sean,
rjgleason
February 5th, 2005, 08:41 AM
Nice group of shop[ts but the first one is best. May I suggest that if you put your pics in the thread and request opinions or critiques, you may want to add what the shooting details are.
more...
makeup Big Sean x
parsu
02-02 08:27 PM
Should not be a problem. I used Cobra while I am on H1 and changed the Employer.
girlfriend Some new Big Sean and No I.D.?
kufloyd
05-20 07:15 PM
I have a question about the Aytes memo - it says that if the name check has been pending for more than 180 days, then the 485 will be adjudicated. My question is when does the 180 day clock start? Is it on the day that the 485 application was received by the service center (going by the receipt date on the 485 notice)? Or is it the day when your PD and processing dates both become current?
Thanks,
Kunal
Thanks,
Kunal
hairstyles 2011 Big Sean - Finally Famous
mchatrvd
06-30 10:24 AM
How can I join the chapter? Please let me know.
Thanks
Thanks
bigboy007
06-01 12:26 PM
core members ? any comments?
jayleno
07-23 10:46 PM
Thanks for the post. I did a search and I got some results. Looking at the results and the name of the site I felt there is a typo in the name.
It should have been stalejobs.com instead of scalejobs.com. If you are remotely associated with the site here is my disclaimer:
I'm not a judge so please do not take my judgement seriously. No offense nor pun is intended in my post.
I came across a good job website and it looks like lot of interesting features than todays job sites.
www.scalejobs.com
It should have been stalejobs.com instead of scalejobs.com. If you are remotely associated with the site here is my disclaimer:
I'm not a judge so please do not take my judgement seriously. No offense nor pun is intended in my post.
I came across a good job website and it looks like lot of interesting features than todays job sites.
www.scalejobs.com
No comments:
Post a Comment