Saturday, May 21, 2011

chicago bulls logo 2011

chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • Eidorian
    May 3, 12:27 PM
    If the monitors cannot daisy chain, you need a hub for the port(s) to which you connect multiple such displays.Thanks, I was just curious.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011. 2011 NBA All-Star Game; 2011 NBA All-Star Game. Chaszmyr. Jul 27, 10:04 AM. Rule 1 of Apple Events:
  • chicago bulls logo 2011. 2011 NBA All-Star Game; 2011 NBA All-Star Game. Chaszmyr. Jul 27, 10:04 AM. Rule 1 of Apple Events:



  • erikamsterdam
    Sep 12, 02:27 PM
    Why oh why are they priced 289 and 399 Euro's in The Netherlands? Who comes up with these stupid high prices here at Apple in Europe? :mad:





    chicago bulls logo 2011. 2010-2011 sports
  • 2010-2011 sports



  • flopticalcube
    Sep 9, 11:06 AM
    Just like the "good" old days all over again.

    68000 32-bits inside, 24-bits (16MB) address outside.
    8088 16-bits inside, 20-bits (1MB) address outside.

    Software (excepting some parts of the OS) doesn't care. Merom is somewhat of a milestone in its 64-bit internals. Down the road there will be an OS release that will not support a 32-bit CPU like Yonah. Of course, 18 months later the next release probably won't support Merom (or Woodcrest) either. :rolleyes:





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • Dagless
    Mar 22, 02:04 PM
    Can't wait! But I will have to. Now we're getting this close and the rumours are starting - there's no way I would ever buy a new iMac until the update. If my current one breaks then the real waiting game begins.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • cmaier
    Nov 13, 05:05 PM
    You may be right, but we haven't seen the emails or the actual rejected programs.

    Furthermore, "The Client Is Always Right", not because they are, but as a matter of principle. The client is in command.

    And I insist, Apple's model makes them the client, which I have to admit brings many benefits to the end user and the platform in general -not so many to the suppliers or developers, except maybe for the fact that it makes the end user more confident to part with their money, of which Apple has the numbers to prove.

    I don't see Apple as the client. After all, they didn't ask for the app. They didn't provide any kind of spec, or put out an RFP, or specify any guidelines as to what it should do. To me they are more of an unwanted kibbutzer looking over my shoulder. On more than one occasion I've had Apple reject updates that did things my customers really wanted, for dumb reasons (usually reasons that they could have asserted for the 20 updates I did prior to that point).





    chicago bulls logo 2011. HOT 2011 NBA Chicago Bulls
  • HOT 2011 NBA Chicago Bulls



  • k2director
    Apr 4, 12:33 PM
    Wow, it seems the majority of posters here are immediately questioning the security guard for shooting a bunch of criminals! I guess he should have been more polite, and given the criminals the chance to shoot him first! Or to run off and try to rob an honest business another time!

    America used to be a country of strong, self-reliant people that would have absolutely no problem with taking down violent criminals *asap*. They would have no tolerance for thuggery, and the result is that there would be far less of it! Now America is filled with a bunch of lambs, who've become so "civilized" that they've lost the instincts needed to confront bullies. Instead, they round themselves up in the pens of a police state, where they leave the unpleasant business of personal defense to "professionals" (the police). And then they whine when the professionals don't do enough to protect them, or start to prey upon them because they *are* so weak.

    This is what happens when earlier generations make a country strong, but are replaced by their children who merely inherit a strong country, with no idea how to maintain it.

    There's only one appropriate course of action with thieves and criminals like the ones described in the article: give them one chance to surrender (not to quit and go home, but surrender), and if they don't take it, then shoot them. Not only is that justice, but it also discourages other criminals far more than the potential for jail terms ever could.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • ten-oak-druid
    Apr 4, 01:01 PM
    So no one would have been able to shoot the 19 people who were shot (and 20 injured) in Tucson? Perhaps not the first one or two or even three, but eventually someone would have been able pull out their gun and take out the guy before he got to 5 let alone 19 or 20.

    It happens quite often when there are people with CC permits around, it just isn't reported as often as the nut job - who already was a criminal - pulls out a gun and kills innocents.

    It might have just happened here too - the who knows where three armed robbers were headed next. They found the 2 in a residential area and closed schools near there.

    And for the people wondering, Chula Vista isn't a very nice area and I'm not surprised that guards who are guarding the area (it is not a completely inside mall if memory serves) were carrying guns at night.

    Yes if five people in the area all pulled out loaded weapons and started shooting, they all would have hit the killer and no one else.

    No one could prevent what happened simply by carrying a gun. He intended to kill and struck without warning.

    What actually happens successfully is that criminals who do not intend to kill but threaten get thwarted. Actual killers or criminals who do not care about taking a life in the process are not actually stopped that often. It is a fantasy story concocted by wanna be heros.

    Look I am not arguing to take your gun away. I want to keep my gun too. But don't tell me these fantasy stories about how we'll all save the day with our concealed weapon. And don't tell me the story about the big bad liberal who wants to take our guns away either. Its just a wedge issue.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. Buy NBA Finals: Chicago Bulls
  • Buy NBA Finals: Chicago Bulls



  • NebulaClash
    Mar 30, 11:52 AM
    Oooh! Grammar Nazis fighting for high stakes!





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • Analog Kid
    Apr 20, 01:15 PM
    Wow, this is really, really bad. I've no idea how any company would think this was acceptable. There's no way this was simply an oversight.

    Absolutely unacceptable.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • longofest
    Apr 22, 12:27 PM
    So Apple's method could be more efficient their side, offering a spotify type model where everyone accesses the same iTunes purchased track (except this time they own it) instead of Amazon's where each indivdual track is stored in their "digital locker"?

    A nice bt of foresight by Apple if so.

    The All Things D article did a bit of speculation on whether or not it would be more efficient, and they got it wrong. Amazon (like many other enterprises) uses Data De-Duplication (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_deduplication) to minimize data duplication. I can guarantee they are using such technology for their cloud storage offering.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • alent1234
    Apr 29, 03:22 PM
    that was in 2005 when it first came out. by now they are on a revision that costs a lot less to make and they have sold a lot of games and XBL subs to make up for it. back when the 360 first came out it had an attach rate of 8 games, higher than Sony. figure at $10 licensing per game that's $80 per console on average plus XBL. so i don't know if the isuppli numbers are accurate.

    a lot of companies in the console market have been doing it like this for years. take a loss the first year or two, sell break even or small profit later in the cycle and make it up on the games. except for nintendo which is doing the opposite. make money early in the cycle and start losing money at the end of the cycle.

    2011 the division will probably turn a profit of $3 to $4 billion or so due to kinect. 2010 was also profitable. if the Nokia partnership works out 2012 will be even better.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • Chris Bangle
    Sep 1, 03:29 AM
    I reckon Steves easily got rights to sell uk movies on itunes, hoping touchscreen thing, uk shows and moives and a iphone.

    Has anyone seen how awesome this looks...
    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/portable-media/samsung-ypk5-mp3-mini-boombox-first-unboxing-review-and-video-198099.php





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • LaMerVipere
    Sep 12, 03:36 PM
    *fingers still crossed for a software update for current 5G iPod owners to bring 'em up to speed with all the new features* :rolleyes:





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • chaosbunny
    May 1, 02:49 AM
    Wonder if the top of the line Core i7 Sandy Bridge iMac will be faster than many of the SP Mac Pro configurations.

    Processor wise, pretty sure, gpu wise, maybe in 2 years. :D





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • Multimedia
    Sep 12, 06:31 PM
    just encoded 5 secs of video using the quicktime default export for ipod... now the default is 640 x 480 that plays too.Please explain exactly how from where you did that. I am still trying with handbrake and EyeTV. The EyeTV2 export is supposed to be connected to the QuickTime but the iPod default is not H.264 640x480 in the EyetV2 Export windows.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011.
  • chicago bulls logo 2011.



  • AAPLaday
    Mar 29, 12:53 PM
    What I don't get is....

    Nokia = looser in smart phone market.
    Microsoft = looser in smart phone OS market.

    So... Looser + Looser = Winner?

    I know Nokia has a huge installed base of feature phones, but they're going to have to really step it up to catch up in the smart phone market. Even the old #1 guys (RIM) can't keep up with iOS and Android.

    No. Looser and looser = extra extra baggy! :D





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo black and; chicago bulls logo black and. Full of Win. Mar 22, 03:31 PM
  • chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago bulls logo black and; chicago bulls logo black and. Full of Win. Mar 22, 03:31 PM



  • Thunderbird
    Apr 30, 03:16 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Neither will be redesigned next year. Look at the length of time Apple stuck with the previous design. There are still a few years left to this "look."

    As others have mentioned already, the last redesign was in the Fall of 2009. Before that was the Fall of 2007 (before that was January 2006 with the switch to Intel). The redesign cyles seem to be approx every two years. So 2011 could see another redesign, especially when the last two redesigns coincided with an OS X upgrade. That's why I keep saying look for a redesign this Fall, just before or just after Lion is released.

    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A293 Safari/6531.22.7)


    When do you estimate they will come out with the redesigned exterior?

    See above answer.

    They stuck with the previous design for 3-4 years. It has now been 3 years with the current look.

    No, it has been two years since the previous redesign. That is when the screen sizes changed from 20" and 24" to 21.5 and 27".

    Curious that everyone is clamoring for a thunderbolt-enabled machine, but there isn't a single thunderbolt drive available on the market.

    I guess some people just need to feel like they have new stuff even if it's totally pointless.

    Good points. Thunderbolt won't really be usable for anything until at least this Fall.

    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

    So previous iMac design lasted 4 years...it's been 3. Previous MBP design lasted, what, 6 years? Rumors are meaningless until we see leaked shots or something (remember the iPad 2 rumors?)

    I don't think that overhauling the exterior of iMac or MBP is high on Apple's priority list at the moment and I'd be surprised if it happened within the next year.

    Be prepared to be surprised this Fall.

    Isn't this iMac design from fall of 2009? That's less than two years.

    Bingo. At least someone is paying attention to the redesign cycles.

    Yep. There is little reason for Apple to fear USB 3. It's slower in both theoretical maximum speed and FAR slower in real world maximum speed. The only advantage is... Uhm... TB supports USB so... I guess there isn't one. Yes, I think USB 3 is quite possibly going to be the last iteration of USB.

    Yup, I think Steve has made it loud and clear, it's Thunderbolt all the way. Apple won't be using USB 3 as an interim bridge to, or alongside Thunderbolt.

    I seen it as more of a mid model refresh.
    TECHNICALLY been the same since 2008.

    No it hasn't. Technically, the iMac has only been the same since the last refresh, and less technically, since the last redesign--which was in the Fall of 2009.

    If you mean the aluminum design, that was actually way back in 2007.

    Yes, the iMac was redesigned from the white housing and S-PVA LCD panels to the aluminum housing and IPS (and TN) panels in the Fall of 2007.

    The fall 2009 refresh was a big redesign. The displays were all different sizes, 21.5 and 27" and went edge to edge. This was the first time since moving to Intel that the iMacs had desktop processors instead of the previous mobile chips. It was not a trivial redesign which is why it's unlikely there will be much different about this year's updates other than ports, processors, and storage upgrades.

    Excellent, you are correct. The last redesign was not trivial. And look for a possible redesign this Fall to coincide with the release of Lion. I'm not guarranteeing anything here, it's just been the pattern the last two redesigns.





    chicago bulls logo 2011. Featuring a Chicago Bulls logo
  • Featuring a Chicago Bulls logo



  • TangoCharlie
    Jul 14, 09:25 AM
    [snip]The new processors, code named Conroe, are the desktop versions of the Core Duo processors which currently reside in Apple's MacBook, MacBook Pro and iMac computers.[snip]


    Der. No! The Conroe CPU is the desktop version of the the Merom CPU which is not currently used in any Mac.


    The Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme are widely expected to make their Mac debut in Apple's PowerMac computers which are rumored to be released on August 7th 2006 at the World Wide Developers Conference.


    Der. No! The Woodcrest CPU is widely expected to make its debut in Apple's PowerMac replacement computer (widely expected to be called Mac Pro) on
    August 7th 2006 at the World Wide Developers' Conference.


    Intel is expected to start shipping the new processors on July 23rd with an official announcement on July 27th. The Core 2 Duo will have clock speeds of 1.86GHz, 2.13GHz, 2.4GHz and 2.67GHz while the Core 2 Extreme will clock in at 2.93GHz. ALl share a 1066MHz front side bus with between 2-4MB of L2 cache. Pricing for the chips range from $183 to $999 per chip.


    At last, something concrete!


    As mentioned above, a number of benchmarks of the new chips have been released today, with DailyTech providing a roundup (http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3319) of many reviews.


    The bench marks show that the Conroe based CPU's are going to smoke the AMD competition. :)





    chicago bulls logo 2011. chicago-ulls-large-logo-
  • chicago-ulls-large-logo-



  • !� V �!
    Apr 25, 03:54 PM
    Good. The unibody design was never great, it was just so-so. The AlBook powerbook that preceded it had a MUCH better design.

    The TiBooks where probably my fav of all PowerBook/MacBook Pro finish and design. :D





    Derekasaurus
    Jul 14, 09:19 AM
    Bring 'em on, but place them in a mid-tower case.
    Or a mini. ;-)





    PBF
    Apr 11, 01:59 AM
    Apple don't like the word 'expose' in any form whatsoever. :p





    macfan881
    Sep 12, 05:16 PM
    With The New Get Album artwork is it possible now to update the Artwork to the ipod now? :confused: cause i dont see any of the artwork that i have gotten on my ipod


    Anyone??





    iStudentUK
    Mar 29, 11:53 AM
    Since 1984:
    Cmd-X = Cut
    Cmd-C = Copy
    Cmd-V = Paste

    Grab will snap a picture of a window, the entire screen etc. There is also print to PDF.

    I'm pretty sure he was referring to cut and paste in finder and "windows snap" is where you can snap two windows side by side easily- it is a great feature in W7 and I hope Apple incorporate it in some way.





    manu chao
    Sep 14, 07:59 PM
    Spend your energy on working a few extra hours so you can pay for a RAM upgrade or a 7200 RPM hard drive.

    Done. :D



    No comments:

    Post a Comment